chat loading...
Skip to Main Content

Tax Law Research

Information on researching tax law, authored by the law librarians at Liberty University.

Locating Tax Cases

U.S. District Court decisions are not published by the Government Printing Office, but decisions designated for publication can be found in the following reporters.

Reporter Source
Federal Supplement (F. Supp). West
American Federal Tax Reports (AFTR) Research Institute of America (RIA)
U.S. Tax Cases (USTC) Commerce Clearing House (CCH)


 

Most tax cases are filed before the Tax Court. These cases can be described either as small[1]  or regular tax cases.

  • Small cases are referred to as S cases. They involve tax deficiencies of $50,000 or less.[2] The dispositions in these cases are not subject to appeal nor do they have precedential value.[3]
  • All tax cases other than small cases are regular cases. The Tax Court's opinion or resolution in these cases will be in the form of a regular opinion or a memorandum opinion. Both opinions can be appealed and cited as legal authority (precedents).
    • Regular opinions resolve a novel issue of tax law and constitute a binding precedent.
    • A memorandum opinion applies existing law to the tax issue before the Tax Court. It has only a persuasive effect.
    • For the precedential value of Tax Court cases please see “Types of Tax Court Opinions and Their Precedential Effect.” [4]

The Tax Court exists:

  • to adjudicate tax disputes expeditiously compared to normal litigation.
  • to provide a thorough consideration of tax grievances.
  • to guide a coherent development of tax law.

The Tax Court website provides helpful information such as the following:

Decisions issued by the Tax Court can be divided into the following groups:

  • Reported opinions, also known as “TC Opinions” or “Division Opinions”[5]
    • cases of first impression
    • precedential
    • published in the U.S. Tax Court Reports (T.C.)
  • Memorandum Opinions[6]
    • nonprecedential but persuasive
    • unpublished but available to the public on the Tax Court website
  • Summary Opinions
    • for tax deficiencies of $50,000 or less
    • non-precedential
  • Tax Court Bench (Oral) Opinions
    • The following applies to both the S case and regular cases: “Oral findings of fact or opinion will be recorded in the transcript of the hearing or trial. … may not be relied upon as precedent, except as may be relevant for purposes of establishing the law of the case, res judicata, collateral estoppel, or other similar doctrine.” TAX CT Rule 152
  • Orders

To understand the "anatomy" of a Tax Court Opinion, read “How to Read Tax Court Opinions.”[7]

United States Tax Court Opinions are available through DAWSON, the U.S. Tax Court's electronic filing and case management system. Options are available to search by case, order, or opinion.

DAWSON search options
Tutorials for finding Tax Court Cases, Orders, and Opinion are available on the Court’s website.

DAWSON guides to searching for cases and documents

[1] “The term ‘small tax case’ means a case in which (1) the amount in dispute is $50,000 or less (within the meaning of the Code), (2) the petitioner has made a request under Rule 171, and (3) the Court has concurred in the petitioner's request.” TAX CT Rule 170

[2] I.R.C. § 7463

[3] I.R.C. § 7463 (b)

[4] Kevin Spencer, et al., Types of Tax Court Opinions and Their Precedential Effect TAX CONTROVERSY 360 (October 13, 2016), https://www.taxcontroversy360.com/2016/10/types-of-tax-court-opinions-and-their-precedential-effect/

[5] “Division opinions officially published by the court are those in which a legal issue of first impression is decided, a legal principle is applied or extended to a recurring factual pattern, a significant exception to a previously announced general rule is created, or there are similarly significant and precedentially valuable cases.” Ann Cohen, Judge, U.S. Tax Court. 1 Hous. Bus. & Tax L. J. 1, 7 (2001).

[6] “[C]ases involving application of familiar legal principles to routine factual situations, nonrecurring or enormously complicated factual situations, obsolete statutes or regulations, straightforward factual determinations, or arguments patently lacking in merit will be classified as memorandum opinions.” Id.

[7] See generally, Ann Cohen, How to Read Tax Court Opinions, 1 Hous. Bus. & Tax L. J. 1 (2001).