Evidence-Based Health Care (EBHC) is "the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. Evidence-based clinical practice requires integration of individual clinical expertise and patient preferences with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research and consideration of available resources."
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is "clinical practice in which patient management decisions are consistent with the principles of evidence-based heath care. This means that decisions will be, first of all, consistent with the best evidence about the benefits and downsides of the alternative management strategies. Second, decisions will be consistent with the values and preferences of the individual patient."
How to Use the Medical Literature to Provide Optimal Patient Care
1. Ask: Formulate a structured clinical question using PICO
2. Acquire: Search for and select the best available evidence using the most appropriate resource for the question
3. Appraise: Evaluate the evidence for bias and results
4. Apply: Analyze the results and apply to patient care by considering the risks and outcomes of the evidence
5. Act: Use the evidence by integrating it with clinical expertise and shared decision making with the patient
Before beginning your search of the literature, it's important to understand the difference between background and foreground questions. This will guide you to the correct resource to aid you in answering your question.
Background question: Seek to answer foundational knowledge about a condition, illness, disease, etc.
Foreground question: Seek to answer specific knowledge regarding a clinical decision, usually concerning a specific patient, population, or intervention. According to Guyatt et al. there are 5 types of foreground questions: therapy, harm, differential diagnosis, diagnosis, and prognosis.
Guyatt, G, Rennie, D, Meade, MO, Cook, DJ. Users' Guide to the Medical Literature: Essentials of Evidence-based Clinical Practice. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Education, 2015.
Before you can search the literature, it's important that you carefully break down your question into key search terms. Using PICO will guide you in thinking about your question.
Framing the Clinical Question Using PICO
Guyatt, G, Rennie, D, Meade, MO, Cook, DJ. Users" Guide to the Medical Literature: Essentials of Evidence-based Clinical Practice. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Education, 2015.
Example scenario: A 37-year-old female with Bipolar I Disorder is currently taking olanzapine with a mood stabilizer to manage manic or mixed episodes. The patient is experiencing suboptimal effects from the olanzapine including weight gain and poor satisfaction with the medication. Is it safe and effective to switch from olanzapine to ziprasidone in this patient?
In order to make an evidence-based decision in the clinical setting, an awareness of the levels of evidence is essential. Here you'll find the Haynes pyramid which guides you through the reliability of evidence found in the medical literature.
Townsend W; Donovan K; Ginier E; MacEachern M; Mani N. "Integrated "5S" Levels of Organization of Evidence Pyramid". September 2015. (http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138965). CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Adapted from: Haynes RB. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries and systems: the “5S" evolution of services for evidence-based health care decisions. ACP J Club. 2006 Nov-Dec;145(3):A8-9.
Meta-analysis: A systematic review that uses quantitative methods to synthesize and summarize the results.
Systematic Review: The application of strategies that limit bias in the assembly, critical appraisal, and synthesis of all relevant studies on a specific topic. SRs focus on peer-reviewed publications about a specific health problem and use rigorous, standardized methods for selecting and assessing articles.
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT): An experiment in which subjects in a population are randomly sorted into two or more groups to receive or not receive an experimental preventative or therapeutic procedure or treatment. The two groups' results are then assessed to determine the effectiveness of the treatment.
Controlled Clinical Trial: These experiments are similar to RCTs except that the methods of selecting the groups are non-randomized. These types of studies are more likely to suffer from bias than RCTs.
Observational Study: A type of study in which the researchers compare people who receive an intervention to those who do not. The researchers are not involved in the selection of the population nor the original intervention, but instead compare the records of the patients who had been treated with the intervention to those who had not been treated. Examples of observational studies are cohort and case-control studies.
Case Series: A group or series of case reports involving patients who were given similar treatment. There is no comparison group for case series studies.
(Adapted from CEBM and Dahlgren Memorial Library)
Swanberg SM, Mi M, Engwall K. An integrated, case-based approach to teaching medical students how to locate the best available evidence for
clinical care. MedEdPORTAL. 2017;13:10531. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10531
Background Resources
Studies